OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Tencent: Hy3

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Tencent: Hy3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Tencent: Hy3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.422/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

1525 msGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4B fastest measured p50 TTFT via siliconflow

746 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via deepinfra

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B Tencent: Hy3

Model idgoogle/gemma-4-26b-a4b-ittencent/hy3

Publisher Google AI Studio DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 96#101 IQ 103#77

Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes84

Cheapest route$0.422/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.03587/1M to $0.0633/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1525 ms via siliconflow746 ms via deepinfra

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B routes

Overview8 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.239 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.235 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B 30 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.330 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash28 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.627 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b27 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Tencent: Hy3?

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.422/1M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1525 ms for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and 746 ms for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.