OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.5064/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
$0.136095/1M@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro cheapest route
1033 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean
1318 ms@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro fastest measured p50 TTFT via cloudflare-workers-ai

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 31B@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro
Model idgoogle/gemma-4-31b-itibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro
AI IQ IQ 101#75
Context262,144 tokens131,000 tokens
Provider routes271
Cheapest route$0.5064/1M$0.136095/1M
Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1033 ms via digitalocean1318 ms via cloudflare-workers-ai
Highest measured throughput332 tok/s via cerebrasnot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro?

@cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.5064/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.136095/1M for @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1033 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and 1318 ms for @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and @cf/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.