Free to start

MythoMax 13B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes MythoMax 13B and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MythoMax 13B has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$1.600394/1MMythoMax 13B cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

1289 msMythoMax 13B fastest measured p50 TTFT via mancer

658 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MythoMax 13BZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idgryphe/mythomax-l2-13bz-ai/glm-5.2

PublisherGryphe Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#53

Context8,192 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes133

Cheapest route$1.600394/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.758545/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1289 ms via mancer658 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data238 tok/s via telnyx

Recent route uptime range100.00%57.14% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

MythoMax 13B routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview33 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.366 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash65 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.261 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.259 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.257 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.255 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MythoMax 13B or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

MythoMax 13B has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

Is MythoMax 13B or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.600394/1M for MythoMax 13B and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MythoMax 13B or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1289 ms for MythoMax 13B and 658 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MythoMax 13B and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between gryphe/mythomax-l2-13b and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.