OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.05275/1MJina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough dataJina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b fastest measured p50 TTFT

866 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via deepinfra

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5bZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idjina-ai/jina-code-embeddings-1.5bz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Jina AI Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 120#20

Context32,768 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Provider routes154

Cheapest route$0.05275/1M$2.2999/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data866 ms via deepinfra

Highest measured throughputnot enough data140 tok/s via venice

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data83.33% to 100.00%

Modes embeddings chat

Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b routes

Overview1 endpoints

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview54 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.291 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.289 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.289 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.286 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.285 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.278 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="jina-ai/jina-code-embeddings-1.5b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Is Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.05275/1M for Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b and 866 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Jina AI: Jina Code Embeddings 1.5b and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between jina-ai/jina-code-embeddings-1.5b and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.