Free to start

Mistral Large vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Mistral Large and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Mistral Large has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$2.11/1MMistral Large cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

1080 msMistral Large fastest measured p50 TTFT via mistral

943 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Mistral LargeZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idmistralai/mistral-largez-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Mistral Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#48

Context128,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest route$2.11/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached input$0.05275/1M$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1080 ms via mistral943 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data257 tok/s via parasail

Recent route uptime range100.00%50.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

Mistral Large routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="mistralai/mistral-large",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Mistral Large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Mistral Large has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

Is Mistral Large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.11/1M for Mistral Large and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Mistral Large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1080 ms for Mistral Large and 943 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Mistral Large and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between mistralai/mistral-large and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.