OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs fugu-ultra-v1.1

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs fugu-ultra-v1.1: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. fugu-ultra-v1.1 has the larger context window.

$3.53425/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 cheapest route
$35/1Mfugu-ultra-v1.1 cheapest route
1310 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron
6703 msfugu-ultra-v1.1 fastest measured p50 TTFT via sakana

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6fugu-ultra-v1.1
Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6sakana-ai/fugu-ultra-v1.1
Context262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Credits provider routes171
Cheapest route$3.53425/1M$35/1M
Cached input$0.05275/1M to $0.441676/1M$0.5/1M to $1/1M
Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1310 ms via inceptron6703 ms via sakana
Highest measured throughput93 tok/s via wandbnot enough data
Recent route uptime range66.67% to 100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 routes

fugu-ultra-v1.1 routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or fugu-ultra-v1.1?

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. fugu-ultra-v1.1 has the larger context window.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or fugu-ultra-v1.1 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $3.53425/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $35/1M for fugu-ultra-v1.1. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or fugu-ultra-v1.1 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1310 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 6703 ms for fugu-ultra-v1.1. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and fugu-ultra-v1.1 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and sakana-ai/fugu-ultra-v1.1. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.