OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs ScaleDown Summarize

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. ScaleDown Summarize has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the larger context window. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

$2.532/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 cheapest route

$0.05275/1MScaleDown Summarize cheapest route

1133 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron

2846 msScaleDown Summarize fastest measured p50 TTFT via scaledown

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6ScaleDown Summarize

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6scaledown/summarize

Publisher Kimi ScaleDown

AI IQ IQ 115#52 —

Context262,144 tokens1,000,000 tokens

Credits provider routes171

Cheapest route$2.532/1M$0.05275/1M

Cached input$0.047475/1M to $0.389401/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)has ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1133 ms via inceptron2846 ms via scaledown

Highest measured throughput116 tok/s via azurenot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 routes

Overview17 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

ScaleDown Summarize routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K346 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.644 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.641 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b40 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or ScaleDown Summarize?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or ScaleDown Summarize cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.532/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $0.05275/1M for ScaleDown Summarize. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or ScaleDown Summarize faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1133 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 2846 ms for ScaleDown Summarize. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and ScaleDown Summarize with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and scaledown/summarize. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.