Free to start

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Kimi K2.6 and GLM 4.7 Flash. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash has the lower published input-plus-output rate and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$2.532/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 cheapest route

$0.4853/1MZ.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash cheapest route

949 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron

886 msZ.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via greenference

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6z-ai/glm-4.7-flash

Publisher Kimi Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 114#58 —

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Credits provider routes176

Cheapest route$2.532/1M$0.4853/1M

Cached input$0.047475/1M to $0.422/1M$0.01055/1M to $0.03442/1M

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)has ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT949 ms via inceptron886 ms via greenference

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 routes

Overview17 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash routes

Overview6 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash49 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K345 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.643 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.641 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b41 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.339 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.532/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $0.4853/1M for Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 949 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 886 ms for Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and z-ai/glm-4.7-flash. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.