OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$4.1989/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 cheapest route

$3.95836/1M0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA cheapest route

648 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 fastest measured p50 TTFT via baseten

2594 ms0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA fastest measured p50 TTFT via zero-g

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.60GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.6zero-g/0gm-1.0-35b-a3b-sia

Publisher Kimi 0G Private Computer

AI IQ IQ 119#24 —

Context262,144 tokens32,768 tokens

Provider routes321

Cheapest route$4.1989/1M$3.95836/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT648 ms via baseten2594 ms via zero-g

Highest measured throughput126 tok/s via basetennot enough data

Recent route uptime range66.67% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 routes

Overview32 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA routes

Overview1 endpoints

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.286 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K369 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.667 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b67 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.663 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.661 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.661 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.156 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.6",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.1989/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $3.95836/1M for 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 648 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 2594 ms for 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and zero-g/0gm-1.0-35b-a3b-sia. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.