Kimi K2.6 vs Dolly 2 Security
Practical read: Kimi K2.6 costs about a quarter as much. Dolly 2 Security reads three times more context and starts answering sooner. One API key runs both.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.
Side by side:
| Attribute | Kimi K2.6 | Dolly 2 Security |
|---|---|---|
| Price, 1M in + out | $2.31 Chutes, cheapest route | $8.86 Zro (MoonMath), cheapest route |
| Best for | Low cost | Long documents and speed |
| Input / output, 1M | $0.41 / $1.90 | $2.22 / $6.65 |
| Cached input | $0.041145/1M to $0.427223/1M | $0.47475/1M |
| Context window | 262K 262,144 tokens | 1M 1,000,000 tokens |
| First token, p50 | 1.4 s via Kimi | 1.1 s via Zro (MoonMath) |
| AI IQ | IQ 114 #62 on AI IQ | Unrated |
| Provider routes | 16 with failover | 1 |
| Privacy | Confidential E2EE and zero retention route | Zero retention route |
| Recent route uptime range | 100.00% | 100.00% |
| Publisher | Kimi | zro |
| Modes | chat | chat |
| More detail |
Price adds one million input and one million output tokens on the cheapest route. Prices and speed change: see the monthly reports and run a small eval before you choose a default.
Test both with your agent
Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor or any coding agent.
Compare Kimi K2.6 and Dolly 2 Security in this project through TrustedRouter.
1. Read https://trustedrouter.com/docs/llms.txt
2. Point the OpenAI-compatible client at
https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1 and read the key from
TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY.
3. Run our eval prompts on moonshotai/kimi-k2.6, then on zro/dolly2-security.
4. Show me cost, latency and quality side by side before changing the default.
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key=os.environ["TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY"],
)
for model in ("moonshotai/kimi-k2.6", "zro/dolly2-security"):
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?"}],
)
print(model, response.choices[0].message.content)
for model in moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 zro/dolly2-security; do
curl https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TRUSTEDROUTER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"model\": \"$model\", \"messages\": [{\"role\": \"user\", \"content\": \"What is the capital of France?\"}]}"
done
Questions
Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Dolly 2 Security?
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. Dolly 2 Security has the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.
Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Dolly 2 Security cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.31045/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and $8.862/1M for Dolly 2 Security. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 or Dolly 2 Security faster?
Current measured p50 time to first token is 1416 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and 1105 ms for Dolly 2 Security. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.
Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 and Dolly 2 Security with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 and zro/dolly2-security. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.
More comparisons
All comparisonsTry Kimi K2.6 and Dolly 2 Security with one key.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
No card required. Start with 1 million free tokens.