OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT 5.5

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT 5.5: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. GPT 5.5 has the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$4.131591/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

$36.925/1MGPT 5.5 cheapest route

619 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

not enough dataGPT 5.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT 5.5

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-codeopenai/gpt-5.5-2026-04-23

Publisher Kimi OpenAI

AI IQ IQ 108#67 —

Context262,144 tokens1,050,000 tokens

Credits provider routes131

Cheapest route$4.131591/1M$36.925/1M

Cached input$0.15825/1M to $0.465255/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT619 ms via fireworksnot enough data

Highest measured throughput84 tok/s via fireworksnot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview13 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

GPT 5.5 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.241 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.339 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash38 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code37 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K337 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b35 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code32 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code30 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or GPT 5.5?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or GPT 5.5 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.131591/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and $36.925/1M for GPT 5.5. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or GPT 5.5 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 619 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and not enough data for GPT 5.5. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and GPT 5.5 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code and openai/gpt-5.5-2026-04-23. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.