Free to start

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Tencent: Hy3

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Kimi K2.7 Code and Hy3. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Tencent: Hy3 has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Their context windows are the same size.

$4.173791/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

1034 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron

2382 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via tencent

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 CodeTencent: Hy3

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-codetencent/hy3

Publisher Kimi Tencent Cloud TokenHub

AI IQ IQ 111#73 IQ 99#128

Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes144

Cheapest route$4.173791/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.15825/1M to $0.546617/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1034 ms via inceptron2382 ms via tencent

Highest measured throughput155 tok/s via azurenot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview14 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.347 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.246 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash46 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K342 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code40 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code38 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b38 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.337 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Tencent: Hy3?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $4.173791/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1034 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and 2382 ms for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.