OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 27B

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen 3.8 27B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. Qwen 3.8 27B has the lower published input-plus-output rate. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$12.3435/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

$3.85075/1MQwen 3.8 27B cheapest route

876 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

not enough dataQwen 3.8 27B fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Qwen 3.8 27B

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k3qwen/qwen-3-8-27b

Publisher Kimi Venice

AI IQ IQ 121#24 —

Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes241

Cheapest route$12.3435/1M$3.85075/1M

Cached input$0.205725/1M to $1.693275/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT876 ms via wafernot enough data

Highest measured throughput29 tok/s via atlas-cloudnot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview24 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen 3.8 27B routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.252 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K349 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash49 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b46 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K343 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K341 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K340 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $12.3435/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and $3.85075/1M for Qwen 3.8 27B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen 3.8 27B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 876 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and not enough data for Qwen 3.8 27B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and Qwen 3.8 27B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k3 and qwen/qwen-3-8-27b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.