OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$12.66/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

$0.6752/1MQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 cheapest route

2130 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

1599 msQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 fastest measured p50 TTFT via scaleway

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k3qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507

Publisher Kimi Novita AI

AI IQ IQ 123#17 —

Context1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes379

Cheapest route$12.66/1M$0.6752/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2130 ms via wafer1599 ms via scaleway

Highest measured throughput55 tok/s via deepinfranot enough data

Recent route uptime range50.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview37 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 routes

Overview9 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.291 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K372 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b72 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K369 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K366 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K366 combined provider routes
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.263 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $12.66/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and $0.6752/1M for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2130 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and 1599 ms for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k3 and qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.