OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$8.4/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

$1.56933/1MQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheapest route

1360 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

4017 msQwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 fastest measured p50 TTFT via chutes

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k3qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507

Publisher Kimi DeepInfra

AI IQ IQ 123#14 —

Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes309

Cheapest route$8.4/1M$1.56933/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1360 ms via together4017 ms via chutes

Highest measured throughput43 tok/s via wafernot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%80.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview30 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 routes

Overview9 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.275 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K360 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b55 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K354 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K354 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.154 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.254 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K353 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $8.4/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and $1.56933/1M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1360 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and 4017 ms for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k3 and qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-thinking-2507. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.