OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs GLM 4.6V

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs GLM 4.6V: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

GLM 4.6V has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$12.66/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 cheapest route

$1.266/1MGLM 4.6V cheapest route

2131 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

not enough dataGLM 4.6V fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3GLM 4.6V

Model idmoonshotai/kimi-k3zai-org/glm-4.6v

Publisher Kimi Novita AI

AI IQ IQ 123#17 —

Context1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes382

Cheapest route$12.66/1M$1.266/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2131 ms via togethernot enough data

Highest measured throughput46 tok/s via basetennot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%not enough data

Modes chat chat

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 routes

Overview38 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

GLM 4.6V routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.292 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K374 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b73 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K370 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K369 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K367 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.162 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="moonshotai/kimi-k3",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or GLM 4.6V?

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or GLM 4.6V cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $12.66/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and $1.266/1M for GLM 4.6V. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 or GLM 4.6V faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2131 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and not enough data for GLM 4.6V. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 and GLM 4.6V with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between moonshotai/kimi-k3 and zai-org/glm-4.6v. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.