Free to start

morph-v3-large vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes morph-v3-large and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$2.954/1Mmorph-v3-large cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

1386 msmorph-v3-large fastest measured p50 TTFT via morph

943 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

morph-v3-largeZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idmorph/morph-v3-largez-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Morph Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#48

Context262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest route$2.954/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1386 ms via morph943 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data187 tok/s via venice

Recent route uptime range100.00%83.33% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

morph-v3-large routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="morph/morph-v3-large",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, morph-v3-large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes, the larger context window and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

Is morph-v3-large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.954/1M for morph-v3-large and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is morph-v3-large or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1386 ms for morph-v3-large and 943 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test morph-v3-large and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between morph/morph-v3-large and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.