Find a model

Browse the full catalog →

Free to start

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen3.5-9B. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the lower measured p50 time to first token. Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. Their context windows are the same size.

$0.223309/1MNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning cheapest route
$0.110775/1MQwen: Qwen3.5-9B cheapest route
841 msNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning fastest measured p50 TTFT via io-net
1413 msQwen: Qwen3.5-9B fastest measured p50 TTFT via regolo

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen: Qwen3.5-9B
Model idnvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightningqwen/qwen3.5-9b
AI IQ — IQ 96#139
Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes37
Cheapest route$0.223309/1M$0.110775/1M
Cached input$0.01055/1M to $0.03165/1M$0.0211/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route
Fastest measured p50 TTFT841 ms via io-net1413 ms via regolo
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%
Modes chat chat

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning routes

Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B?

NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has the lower measured p50 time to first token. Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. Their context windows are the same size.

Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.223309/1M for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and $0.110775/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 841 ms for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and 1413 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning and qwen/qwen3.5-9b. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

New to TrustedRouter?

By continuing you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.