OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

chat-latest vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$36.925/1Mchat-latest cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough datachat-latest fastest measured p50 TTFT

595 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

chat-latestZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idopenai/chat-latestz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher OpenAI Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 119#45

Context0 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest route$36.925/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached input$0.5275/1M$0.131875/1M to $0.93473/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data595 ms via friendli

Highest measured throughputnot enough data189 tok/s via io-net

Recent route uptime range100.00%42.86% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

chat-latest routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash66 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.261 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.259 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.255 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="openai/chat-latest",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, chat-latest or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is chat-latest or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $36.925/1M for chat-latest and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is chat-latest or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for chat-latest and 595 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test chat-latest and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between openai/chat-latest and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.