OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Tencent: Hy3

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Tencent: Hy3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Tencent: Hy3 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has more provider fallback routes, while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Tencent: Hy3 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$3.63975/1MQwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B cheapest route

$0.6963/1MTencent: Hy3 cheapest route

1597 msQwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B fastest measured p50 TTFT via morph

746 msTencent: Hy3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via deepinfra

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BTencent: Hy3

Model idqwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17btencent/hy3

Publisher DeepInfra DeepInfra

AI IQ — IQ 103#77

Context262,144 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes104

Cheapest route$3.63975/1M$0.6963/1M

Cached input$0.047475/1M to $0.58025/1M$0.034815/1M to $0.05275/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1597 ms via morph746 ms via deepinfra

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range50.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B routes

Overview10 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Tencent: Hy3 routes

Overview4 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.241 combined provider routes
Tencent: Hy3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.235 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B33 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B32 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.332 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash30 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B29 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B29 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Tencent: Hy3?

Is Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Tencent: Hy3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $3.63975/1M for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and $0.6963/1M for Tencent: Hy3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Tencent: Hy3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1597 ms for Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and 746 ms for Tencent: Hy3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Tencent: Hy3 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b and tencent/hy3. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.