OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Recraft V2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3

Recraft V2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

selected routeRecraft V2 cheapest route

$3.458818/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.3 cheapest route

not enough dataRecraft V2 fastest measured p50 TTFT

750 msZ.ai: GLM 5.3 fastest measured p50 TTFT via sail-research

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Recraft V2Z.ai: GLM 5.3

Model idrecraft/recraftv2z-ai/glm-5.3

Publisher Recraft Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 125#24

Context0 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes131

Cheapest routeselected route$3.458818/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.133141/1M to $1.02546/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data750 ms via sail-research

Highest measured throughputnot enough data407 tok/s via wafer

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data90.91% to 100.00%

Modes chat

Recraft V2 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 routes

Overview31 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash63 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.362 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.359 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.358 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.354 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.352 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.349 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.348 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

Questions

Which should I use, Recraft V2 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3?

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 has more Credits provider routes. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is Recraft V2 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Recraft V2 and $3.458818/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Recraft V2 or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Recraft V2 and 750 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.3. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Recraft V2 and Z.ai: GLM 5.3 with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.