Free to start

TypeSafe AI Jev vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes TypeSafe AI Jev and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

TypeSafe AI Jev has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.04431/1MTypeSafe AI Jev cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

not enough dataTypeSafe AI Jev fastest measured p50 TTFT

591 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

TypeSafe AI JevZ.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idtypesafe-ai/jevz-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher TypeSafe AI Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 118#50

Context32,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest route$0.04431/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data591 ms via together

Highest measured throughputnot enough data290 tok/s via telnyx

Recent route uptime range100.00%66.67% to 100.00%

Modes decide chat

TypeSafe AI Jev routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.252 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

POST /api/alpha/decidecurl

curl https://api.trustedrouter.com/api/alpha/decide \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-tr-v1-..." \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "typesafe-ai/jev",
    "state": "Customer: I was charged twice for order A-1.",
    "questions": {
      "refund": {"type": "boolean", "instructions": "Is a refund requested?"}
    }
  }'

Decision models: the API, the models, the numbers

Questions

Which should I use, TypeSafe AI Jev or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

TypeSafe AI Jev has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

Is TypeSafe AI Jev or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.04431/1M for TypeSafe AI Jev and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is TypeSafe AI Jev or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for TypeSafe AI Jev and 591 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test TypeSafe AI Jev and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Both take the same request on POST /api/alpha/decide, with the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key, so a side-by-side eval changes only the model id between typesafe-ai/jev and z-ai/glm-5.2. TypeSafe AI Jev does not take chat requests.