Free to start

Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 and GLM 5.2. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Their context windows are the same size.

$0.53172/1MXiaomi MiMo V2.5 cheapest route

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

4287 msXiaomi MiMo V2.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT via novita

1010 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via inceptron

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Xiaomi MiMo V2.5Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Model idxiaomimimo/mimo-v2.5z-ai/glm-5.2

Publisher Xiaomi MiMo Z.AI

AI IQ IQ 108#84 IQ 118#48

Context1,048,576 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes132

Cheapest route$0.53172/1M$2.2999/1M

Cached input$0.01/1M$0.131875/1M to $0.84611/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFT4287 ms via novita1010 ms via inceptron

Highest measured throughputnot enough data170 tok/s via friendli

Recent route uptime range100.00%83.33% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview32 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.365 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash64 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.258 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.256 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.251 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="xiaomimimo/mimo-v2.5",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2?

Is Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.53172/1M for Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 and $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 or Z.ai: GLM 5.2 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 4287 ms for Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 and 1010 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 and Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between xiaomimimo/mimo-v2.5 and z-ai/glm-5.2. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.