OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Z.ai: GLM 5.2 has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Z.ai: GLM 5.2 with the lower p50 TTFT.

$2.2999/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.2 cheapest route

$3.95836/1M0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA cheapest route

778 msZ.ai: GLM 5.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

2074 ms0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA fastest measured p50 TTFT via zero-g

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Z.ai: GLM 5.20GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA

Model idz-ai/glm-5.2zero-g/0gm-1.0-35b-a3b-sia

Publisher Z.AI 0G Private Computer

AI IQ IQ 120#27 —

Context1,048,576 tokens32,768 tokens

Credits provider routes311

Cheapest route$2.2999/1M$3.95836/1M

Cached input$0.110775/1M to $0.73006/1M$0.188494/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas confidential-compute route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT778 ms via together2074 ms via zero-g

Highest measured throughput176 tok/s via siliconflownot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Z.ai: GLM 5.2 routes

Overview31 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.254 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.253 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.353 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.250 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.247 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="z-ai/glm-5.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA?

Is Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.2999/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and $3.95836/1M for 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Z.ai: GLM 5.2 or 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 778 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and 2074 ms for 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Z.ai: GLM 5.2 and 0GM-1.0-35B-A3B-SIA with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between z-ai/glm-5.2 and zero-g/0gm-1.0-35b-a3b-sia. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.