MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 Performance
Compare measured TTFT, throughput, uptime, and route health for MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5 across TrustedRouter providers using metadata-only production probes.
minimax/minimax-m2.5
Measured performance
Continuously sampled p50/p95 time-to-first-token (TTFT), effective throughput, and success rate for MiniMax: MiniMax M2.5. Effective throughput uses provider-reported output tokens over complete request time. Unsupported route and probe-configuration rows are separated from provider downtime, and no prompt or output content is stored.
| Provider | p50 TTFT | p95 TTFT | Effective throughput | Uptime | Config excluded | Availability samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| siliconflow | 1650 ms | 3294 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 2 |
| friendli | 1970 ms | 2299 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 5 |
| novita | 2107 ms | 3143 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 2 |
| io-net | 2197 ms | 3455 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 2 |
| digitalocean | 2376 ms | 2857 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 2 |
| inceptron | — | — | — | 0.00% | — | 6 |
Full provider & model leaderboard.
7 routes.
More routes give the auto router more room to fail over around provider 429 and 5xx responses.
Gateway overhead is measured separately.
Public status separates TLS/health overhead from full model latency so slow LLMs do not inflate the router metric.
Metadata rollups.
Status samples store latency, outcome, provider, model, route, cost, and region metadata only.
View public status or inspect provider routes.