OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 Performance

Compare measured TTFT, throughput, uptime, and route health for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 across TrustedRouter providers using metadata-only production probes.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

open weights Performance

All models

AI IQ IQ 111 #55 public AI IQ rank for kimi-k2.5
View AI IQ profile

Measured performance

Continuously sampled p50/p95 time-to-first-token (TTFT), effective throughput, and success rate for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5. Effective throughput uses provider-reported output tokens over complete request time. Unsupported route and probe-configuration rows are separated from provider downtime, and no prompt or output content is stored.

Providerp50 TTFTp95 TTFTEffective throughputUptimeConfig excludedAvailability samples
alibaba 1820 ms 1820 ms 100.00% 1
novita 1832 ms 1832 ms 100.00% 1
nscale 1905 ms 3782 ms 100.00% 4
telnyx 2075 ms 2535 ms 100.00% 3
siliconflow 2275 ms 2275 ms 100.00% 1
digitalocean 2356 ms 2582 ms 100.00% 3
io-net 2398 ms 2398 ms 100.00% 1
azure 3320 ms 4971 ms 100.00% 3

Full provider & model leaderboard.

Provider diversity

9 routes.

More routes give the auto router more room to fail over around provider 429 and 5xx responses.

Streaming

Gateway overhead is measured separately.

Public status separates TLS/health overhead from full model latency so slow LLMs do not inflate the router metric.

Status

Metadata rollups.

Status samples store latency, outcome, provider, model, route, cost, and region metadata only.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.