Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash Performance
Compare measured TTFT, throughput, uptime, and route health for MiMo-V2.6-Flash across TrustedRouter providers using metadata-only production probes.
xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-flash
Measured performance
Continuously sampled p50/p95 time-to-first-token (TTFT), effective throughput, and success rate for Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash. Effective throughput uses provider-reported output tokens over complete request time. Unsupported route and probe-configuration rows are separated from provider downtime, and no prompt or output content is stored.
| Provider | p50 TTFT | p95 TTFT | Effective throughput | Uptime | Config excluded | Availability samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tencent | 1815 ms | 9374 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 2 |
| boundless | 1909 ms | 2572 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 5 |
| io-net | 5476 ms | 5476 ms | — | 100.00% | — | 1 |
| xiaomi | 9491 ms | 22690 ms | — | 80.00% | — | 5 |
Full provider & model leaderboard.
5 routes.
More routes give the auto router more room to fail over around provider 429 and 5xx responses.
Gateway overhead is measured separately.
Public status separates TLS/health overhead from full model latency so slow LLMs do not inflate the router metric.
Metadata rollups.
Status samples store latency, outcome, provider, model, route, cost, and region metadata only.
View public status or inspect provider routes.