OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

AionLabs: Aion 2.0 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

AionLabs: Aion 2.0 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$2.532/1MAionLabs: Aion 2.0 cheapest route

$0.5064/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

2090 msAionLabs: Aion 2.0 fastest measured p50 TTFT via aion-labs

1035 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

AionLabs: Aion 2.0Google: Gemma 4 31B

Model idaion-labs/aion-2.0google/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Aion Labs Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#75

Context131,072 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes127

Cheapest route$2.532/1M$0.5064/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2090 ms via aion-labs1035 ms via digitalocean

Highest measured throughputnot enough data128 tok/s via tinfoil

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

AionLabs: Aion 2.0 routes

Overview1 endpoints

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview27 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.279 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K364 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B60 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.658 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b58 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B55 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.150 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="aion-labs/aion-2.0",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, AionLabs: Aion 2.0 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is AionLabs: Aion 2.0 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.532/1M for AionLabs: Aion 2.0 and $0.5064/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is AionLabs: Aion 2.0 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2090 ms for AionLabs: Aion 2.0 and 1035 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test AionLabs: Aion 2.0 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between aion-labs/aion-2.0 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.