OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$2.532/1MAionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) cheapest route

$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

1773 msAionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) fastest measured p50 TTFT via aion-labs

807 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via lightning

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Google: Gemma 4 31B

Model idaion-labs/aion-rp-llama-3.1-8bgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Aion Labs Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#80

Context32,768 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes130

Cheapest route$2.532/1M$0.4642/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1773 ms via aion-labs807 ms via lightning

Highest measured throughputnot enough data90 tok/s via cerebras

Recent route uptime range100.00%25.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) routes

Overview1 endpoints

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview30 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.285 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B67 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b66 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.662 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B61 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B55 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="aion-labs/aion-rp-llama-3.1-8b",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.532/1M for AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1773 ms for AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) and 807 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test AionLabs: Aion-RP 1.0 (8B) and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between aion-labs/aion-rp-llama-3.1-8b and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.