Find a model

Browse the full catalog →

Free to start

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes Claude Haiku 5.5 and Gemma 4 31B. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window. Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

$0.633/1MAnthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 cheapest route
$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
1567 msAnthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 fastest measured p50 TTFT via anthropic
665 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5Google: Gemma 4 31B
Model idanthropic/claude-haiku-5.5google/gemma-4-31b-it
Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes116
Cheapest route$0.633/1M$0.45365/1M
Cached input$0.01055/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)
Fastest measured p50 TTFT1567 ms via anthropic665 ms via crusoe
Highest measured throughputnot enough data146 tok/s via crusoe
Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat messages chat

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window. Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token.

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.633/1M for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 and $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1567 ms for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 and 665 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

New to TrustedRouter?

By continuing you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.