OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$31.5/1Manthropic/claude-opus-4-8 cheapest route

$0.504/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataanthropic/claude-opus-4-8 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1351 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8Google: Gemma 4 31B

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4-8google/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Anthropic Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#66

Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes224

Cheapest route$31.5/1M$0.504/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1351 ms via crusoe

Highest measured throughputnot enough data191 tok/s via lightning

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data88.89% to 100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.271 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K357 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.654 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B53 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Google: Gemma 4 31B51 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b50 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.148 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B44 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4-8",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $31.5/1M for anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and $0.504/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and 1351 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4-8 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.