OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

$94.95/1MClaude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding cheapest route

$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataClaude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding fastest measured p50 TTFT

995 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via tinfoil

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 CodingGoogle: Gemma 4 31B

Model idanthropic/claude-opus-4.1-20250805-codinggoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Anthropic Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#115

Context200,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes016

Cheapest route$94.95/1M$0.45365/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data995 ms via tinfoil

Highest measured throughputnot enough data215 tok/s via tinfoil

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat messages chat

Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding routes

Overview0 Credits routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview16 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.349 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash49 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.248 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K344 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B43 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B40 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b39 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.1-20250805-coding",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $94.95/1M for Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding and $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding and 995 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Claude Opus 4.1 20250805 Coding and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between anthropic/claude-opus-4.1-20250805-coding and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.