OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Decart Lucy Restyle 2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Decart Lucy Restyle 2 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Decart Lucy Restyle 2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

selected routeDecart Lucy Restyle 2 cheapest route

$0.5064/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataDecart Lucy Restyle 2 fastest measured p50 TTFT

1035 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via digitalocean

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Decart Lucy Restyle 2Google: Gemma 4 31B

Model iddecart/lucy-restyle-2google/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher Decart Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#75

Context10,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes127

Cheapest routeselected route$0.5064/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1035 ms via digitalocean

Highest measured throughputnot enough data91 tok/s via sambanova

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat

Decart Lucy Restyle 2 routes

Overview1 endpoints

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview27 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.279 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K364 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B60 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.658 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b58 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B55 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.150 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="decart/lucy-restyle-2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Decart Lucy Restyle 2 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is Decart Lucy Restyle 2 or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is selected route for Decart Lucy Restyle 2 and $0.5064/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Decart Lucy Restyle 2 or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Decart Lucy Restyle 2 and 1035 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Decart Lucy Restyle 2 and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between decart/lucy-restyle-2 and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.