OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek OCR vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek OCR vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek OCR has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$0.1266/1MDeepSeek OCR cheapest route

$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataDeepSeek OCR fastest measured p50 TTFT

979 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via tinfoil

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek OCRGoogle: Gemma 4 31B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-ocrgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 103#80

Context8,192 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes114

Cheapest route$0.1266/1M$0.4642/1M

Cached input$0.0422/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.211/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data979 ms via tinfoil

Highest measured throughputnot enough data156 tok/s via tinfoil

Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek OCR routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview14 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.242 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.340 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash40 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B38 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K338 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b36 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.634 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B31 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-ocr",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek OCR or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is DeepSeek OCR or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.1266/1M for DeepSeek OCR and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek OCR or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for DeepSeek OCR and 979 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek OCR and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-ocr and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.