OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway
Onebase URL to migrate
100sof models and routes
0prompt or output logs. Always.
Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.
Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.
Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$1.31875/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheapest route
$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route
not enough dataDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus fastest measured p50 TTFT
1066 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via tinfoil

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusGoogle: Gemma 4 31B
Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.1-terminusgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it
AI IQ IQ 101#80
Context131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
Credits provider routes313
Cheapest route$1.31875/1M$0.4642/1M
Cached input$0.13715/1M to $0.142425/1M$0.02743/1M to $0.1477/1M
Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas provider E2EE route
Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data1066 ms via tinfoil
Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data
Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%
Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison
Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.1-terminus",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.31875/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 1066 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.1-terminus and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.

Workspace access

Sign in

Choose a sign in method to access your TrustedRouter workspace.

By signing in you agree to the terms of service and privacy policy.