OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.6752/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 cheapest route

$4.7475/1MGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash cheapest route

2583 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 fastest measured p50 TTFT via friendli

1321 msGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via google-vertex

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v3.2google/gemini-3.7-flash

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ IQ 103#74 IQ 123#18

Context163,840 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes93

Cheapest route$0.6752/1M$4.7475/1M

Cached input$0.079125/1M to $0.754378/1M$0.079125/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2583 ms via friendli1321 ms via google-vertex

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 routes

Overview9 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash routes

Overview3 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.240 combined provider routes
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.234 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K332 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 073131 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.331 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash29 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.628 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b28 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v3.2",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.6752/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and $4.7475/1M for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 or Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2583 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and 1321 ms for Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 and Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 and google/gemini-3.7-flash. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.