OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast vs Google: Gemma 4 31B: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.882/1MDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast cheapest route

$0.504/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

1216 msDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast fastest measured p50 TTFT via wafer

1351 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 FastGoogle: Gemma 4 31B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-fastgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#66

Context1,000,000 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes424

Cheapest route$0.882/1M$0.504/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas provider E2EE route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1216 ms via wafer1351 ms via crusoe

Highest measured throughputnot enough data191 tok/s via lightning

Recent route uptime range100.00%88.89% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast routes

Overview4 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview24 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.271 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K357 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.654 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B53 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Google: Gemma 4 31B51 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b50 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.148 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B44 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-fast",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.882/1M for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and $0.504/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1216 ms for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and 1351 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Fast and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-fast and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.