OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen3.8 Max

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen3.8 Max: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has more provider fallback routes, while DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$2.75355/1MDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 cheapest route

$6.964055/1MQwen3.8 Max cheapest route

2503 msDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

not enough dataQwen3.8 Max fastest measured p50 TTFT

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Qwen3.8 Max

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4-proqwen/qwen3.8-max

Publisher DeepSeek Novita AI

AI IQ IQ 117#32 IQ 119#27

Context1,048,576 tokens1,000,000 tokens

Provider routes298

Cheapest route$2.75355/1M$6.964055/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT2503 ms via fireworksnot enough data

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 routes

Overview29 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen3.8 Max routes

Overview8 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.283 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K366 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042364 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b64 combined provider routes
Qwen3.8 Max vs Z.ai: GLM 5.262 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.661 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 042360 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B58 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen3.8 Max?

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen3.8 Max cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $2.75355/1M for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and $6.964055/1M for Qwen3.8 Max. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 or Qwen3.8 Max faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 2503 ms for DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and not enough data for Qwen3.8 Max. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 and Qwen3.8 Max with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro and qwen/qwen3.8-max. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.