Free to start

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Try both on us. Starter credit covers your first requests, then one key routes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 4 31B. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window. Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate and more Credits provider routes. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$1.5825/1MDeepSeek V4.1 Flash cheapest route

$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

not enough dataDeepSeek V4.1 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT

677 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via tinfoil

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGoogle: Gemma 4 31B

Model iddeepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-pgoogle/gemma-4-31b-it

Publisher DeepSeek Google AI Studio

AI IQ — IQ 101#117

Context1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens

Credits provider routes113

Cheapest route$1.5825/1M$0.4642/1M

Cached input$0.01/1M$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data677 ms via tinfoil

Highest measured throughputnot enough data181 tok/s via crusoe

Recent route uptime range100.00%0.00% to 100.00%

Modes chat chat

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview13 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.346 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.245 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash45 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K341 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B39 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B37 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b37 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B33 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-p",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $1.5825/1M for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Google: Gemma 4 31B faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and 677 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Google: Gemma 4 31B with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-p and google/gemma-4-31b-it. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.