Google: Gemma 4 31B vs meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct
Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.
Practical read
Monthly evidenceGoogle: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token.
The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.
google/gemma-4-31b-itmeta-llama/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct
Google: Gemma 4 31B routes
meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct routes
- Overview1 Credits routes
Related comparisons
Browse every comparison- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.350 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.249 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K346 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B44 combined provider routes
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B41 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b40 combined provider routes
- Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes
Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.
TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
messages=messages,
)
Questions
Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct?
Google: Gemma 4 31B has the lower published input-plus-output rate, more Credits provider routes and the lower measured p50 time to first token.
Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct cheaper?
The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $12.66/1M for meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.
Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct faster?
Current measured p50 time to first token is 1073 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and 2255 ms for meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.
Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and meta/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct with the same API?
Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and meta-llama/llama-3.2-90b-vision-instruct. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.