OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Scout Instruct

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Llama 4 Scout Instruct: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Llama 4 Scout Instruct has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.4642/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

$0.422/1MLlama 4 Scout Instruct cheapest route

807 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via lightning

1242 msLlama 4 Scout Instruct fastest measured p50 TTFT via cloudflare-workers-ai

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 31BLlama 4 Scout Instruct

Model idgoogle/gemma-4-31b-itmeta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct

Publisher Google AI Studio Cerebras

AI IQ IQ 101#80 —

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes305

Cheapest route$0.4642/1M$0.422/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routeprovider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT807 ms via lightning1242 ms via cloudflare-workers-ai

Highest measured throughput90 tok/s via cerebrasnot enough data

Recent route uptime range25.00% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview30 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Llama 4 Scout Instruct routes

Overview5 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.285 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K368 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B67 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b66 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.662 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B61 combined provider routes
Llama 4 Scout Instruct vs Z.ai: GLM 5.260 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash56 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Scout Instruct?

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Scout Instruct cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.4642/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.422/1M for Llama 4 Scout Instruct. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or Llama 4 Scout Instruct faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 807 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and 1242 ms for Llama 4 Scout Instruct. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and Llama 4 Scout Instruct with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and meta-llama/llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.