Bring your own key

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs TrustedRouter Oev 1.0

One key routes both. Starter credit covers your first Gemma 4 31B requests, while TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 runs on your own provider key. Switch by changing the model name.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 4 31B has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. A published Credits price comparison is not available for both models. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed.

$0.45365/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

$0.17935/1MTrustedRouter Oev 1.0 cheapest route

665 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via crusoe

not enough dataTrustedRouter Oev 1.0 fastest measured p50 TTFT

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 31BTrustedRouter Oev 1.0

Model idgoogle/gemma-4-31b-ittrustedrouter/oev-1.0

Publisher Google AI Studio TrustedRouter

AI IQ IQ 101#116 —

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Credits provider routes160

Cheapest route$0.45365/1M$0.17935/1M

Cached input$0.03798/1M to $0.26375/1MNot published

Privacy posturehas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)provider posture varies

Fastest measured p50 TTFT665 ms via crusoenot enough data

Highest measured throughput146 tok/s via crusoenot enough data

Recent route uptime range0.00% to 100.00%not enough data

Modes chat decide

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview16 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 routes

Overview0 Credits routes

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.349 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.248 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash48 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K344 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B42 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B40 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b40 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B35 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or TrustedRouter Oev 1.0?

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.45365/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.17935/1M for TrustedRouter Oev 1.0. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 665 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and not enough data for TrustedRouter Oev 1.0. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 with the same API?

Yes. Both take the same request on POST /api/alpha/decide, with the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key, so a side-by-side eval changes only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and trustedrouter/oev-1.0. TrustedRouter Oev 1.0 does not take chat requests.