OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano has the lower published input-plus-output rate. Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash has more Credits provider routes and the larger context window. There is not enough recent probe data to compare speed. Compare price, speed, context, and privacy.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

$0.0211/1MJina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano cheapest route

$0.32705/1MZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash cheapest route

not enough dataJina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano fastest measured p50 TTFT

636 msZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

The price comparison adds each route's rate for one million input tokens and one million output tokens; your cost depends on your input/output mix. Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text NanoZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash

Model idjina-ai/jina-embeddings-v5-text-nanoz-ai/glm-5.3-flash

Publisher Jina AI Z.AI

AI IQ — IQ 120#42

Context8,192 tokens1,048,576 tokens

Credits provider routes134

Cheapest route$0.0211/1M$0.32705/1M

Cached inputNot published$0.01266/1M to $0.076488/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas Confidential route (E2EE + ZDR)

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data636 ms via together

Highest measured throughputnot enough datanot enough data

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data0.00% to 100.00%

Modes embeddings chat

Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano routes

Overview1 Credits routes

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash routes

Overview34 Credits routes
PricingInput, cached input, and output rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash67 combined provider routes
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash66 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash63 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash61 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash58 combined provider routes
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash57 combined provider routes
Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash52 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash51 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

Questions

Which should I use, Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash?

Is Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.0211/1M for Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano and $0.32705/1M for Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano or Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano and 636 ms for Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Jina AI: Jina Embeddings v5 Text Nano and Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash with the same API?

Both use the same TrustedRouter base URL and API key. At least one of them is not a chat model, so the request can differ as well as the model id: the API docs list the route for each kind of model.