OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

LongCat 2.0 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

LongCat 2.0 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

LongCat 2.0 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more provider fallback routes, while LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window. Probe-backed speed data is shown when enough recent samples exist.

$3.95625/1MLongCat 2.0 cheapest route

$4.29385/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

not enough dataLongCat 2.0 fastest measured p50 TTFT

903 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via fireworks

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

LongCat 2.0MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

Model idmeituan-longcat/longcat-2.0moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

Publisher Atlas Cloud Kimi

AI IQ IQ 98#85 IQ 118#29

Context1,048,756 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes122

Cheapest route$3.95625/1M$4.29385/1M

Privacy postureprovider posture varieshas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFTnot enough data903 ms via fireworks

Highest measured throughputnot enough data58 tok/s via azure

Recent route uptime rangenot enough data100.00%

Modes chat chat

LongCat 2.0 routes

Overview1 endpoints

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview22 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.276 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K359 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code57 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b57 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code54 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code53 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code51 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code51 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="meituan-longcat/longcat-2.0",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, LongCat 2.0 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code?

Is LongCat 2.0 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $3.95625/1M for LongCat 2.0 and $4.29385/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is LongCat 2.0 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is not enough data for LongCat 2.0 and 903 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test LongCat 2.0 and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between meituan-longcat/longcat-2.0 and moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.