OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 3n 4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

Google: Gemma 3n 4B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Google: Gemma 3n 4B has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has more provider fallback routes, while MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 3n 4B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.1899/1MGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B cheapest route

$4.29385/1MMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheapest route

866 msGoogle: Gemma 3n 4B fastest measured p50 TTFT via together

1322 msMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code fastest measured p50 TTFT via io-net

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 3n 4BMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code

Model idgoogle/gemma-3n-e4b-itmoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code

Publisher Google AI Studio Kimi

AI IQ — IQ 118#29

Context32,768 tokens262,144 tokens

Provider routes222

Cheapest route$0.1899/1M$4.29385/1M

Privacy posturehas ZDR routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT866 ms via together1322 ms via io-net

Highest measured throughputnot enough data114 tok/s via baseten

Recent route uptime range100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 3n 4B routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code routes

Overview22 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
BenchmarksTrustedRouter and external sources
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Z.ai: GLM 5.275 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K359 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code57 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code54 combined provider routes
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b54 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code52 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code51 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code50 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-3n-e4b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 3n 4B or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code?

Is Google: Gemma 3n 4B or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.1899/1M for Google: Gemma 3n 4B and $4.29385/1M for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 3n 4B or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 866 ms for Google: Gemma 3n 4B and 1322 ms for MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 3n 4B and MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-3n-e4b-it and moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.