OpenAI compatible API · Attested · Public status

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: compare current API pricing, context, provider routes, privacy, p50 latency, and OpenAI-compatible access.

Verify gateway

Onebase URL to migrate

100sof models and routes

0prompt or output logs. Always.

Compare routesProviders, price, context, and policy posture in one view.

Use auto when uptime mattersKeep a primary model and let fallback handle provider failures.

Same API shapeUse the OpenAI client and set the model you want.

Practical read

Monthly evidence

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has the lower cheapest prompt+completion route on TrustedRouter. Google: Gemma 4 31B has more provider fallback routes, while Google: Gemma 4 31B has the larger context window. Current TrustedRouter probes show Google: Gemma 4 31B with the lower p50 TTFT.

$0.5064/1MGoogle: Gemma 4 31B cheapest route

$0.422/1MQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 cheapest route

1433 msGoogle: Gemma 4 31B fastest measured p50 TTFT via cerebras

3283 msQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 fastest measured p50 TTFT via nebius

Prices and live route measurements can change. Use the monthly reports when you need a stable evidence window, then run a small task-specific eval before choosing a production default.

Google: Gemma 4 31BQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507

Model idgoogle/gemma-4-31b-itQwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Publisher Google AI Studio Nebius Token Factory

AI IQ IQ 101#75 —

Context262,144 tokens131,072 tokens

Provider routes272

Cheapest route$0.5064/1M$0.422/1M

Privacy posturehas provider E2EE routehas ZDR route

Fastest measured p50 TTFT1433 ms via cerebras3283 ms via nebius

Highest measured throughput197 tok/s via friendlinot enough data

Recent route uptime range87.50% to 100.00%100.00%

Modes chat chat

Google: Gemma 4 31B routes

Overview27 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 routes

Overview2 endpoints
PricingPrompt and completion rates
ProvidersAll serving providers

Related comparisons

Browse every comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.279 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K364 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B61 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.658 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b58 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B56 combined provider routes
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B55 combined provider routes
Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.150 combined provider routes

Production choice

Pick a default model. Keep fallback enabled.

TrustedRouter is useful when you know the model you want, but still need provider rollover, budget limits, usage records, and a prompt path you can verify.

OpenAI clientPython

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://api.trustedrouter.com/v1",
    api_key="sk-tr-v1-..."
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="google/gemma-4-31b-it",
    messages=messages,
)

Questions

Which should I use, Google: Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 cheaper?

The current cheapest TrustedRouter route is $0.5064/1M for Google: Gemma 4 31B and $0.422/1M for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507. The comparison uses current catalog prices and updates as provider pricing changes.

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 faster?

Current measured p50 time to first token is 1433 ms for Google: Gemma 4 31B and 3283 ms for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507. These are routed probe measurements, not vendor-advertised speeds, and update as new samples arrive.

Can I test Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 with the same API?

Yes. Use the same OpenAI-compatible TrustedRouter base URL and API key, then change only the model id between google/gemma-4-31b-it and Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507. This makes side-by-side evals possible without maintaining two provider integrations.